In the long run we are all dead
but our children will be left to pick up the tab.

Pete Peterson on Health Care

The Education of an American Dreamer

The Education of an American Dreamer by Peter G. Peterson

Another one of America’s finance billionaires has written a book and is making the obligatory media rounds; I caught Peter Peterson on Good Morning America this morning during his 5 minute interview with Diane Sawyer. Along with the typical ‘rags to riches’ bio, Mr. Peterson seems to have some concerns for the future indentured servants generations:

Not unlike another successful investor from Nebraska, Peterson, nearing the end of the road, offers a few tidbits on how we might solve the looming fiscal disaster of aging Boomers:

1. Develop a Health Care Budget

Peterson said he believes the United States spends far too much on health care. “We’re the only country that doesn’t have a budget for health care,” Peterson said. “They leave it to the states and Medicare to decide how to allocate [the money].” Without a federal budget, Peterson described the system as “totally open-ended” and called the incentives “perverse.”

I’ve heard this argument before – essentially we spend, on average, a larger amount per/person than other industrialized nations, though we receive far less care. However, as most of this money is recycled back into the US instead of China, the problem is not that we spend too much money, it is that too much money is being funneled away from the middle class and towards the top 10% via the health insurance industry and Big Pharma®.

2. Develop a Best Practices Method in Health Care

The current system encourages endless tests that, Peterson argued, are inefficient and costly. “You [patients] don’t care what kind of procedures and tests they do because it doesn’t cost you anything,” Peterson said. But for the doctors, Peterson said, the increased chance for profits and the decreased chance of litigation make it worthwhile to conduct expensive, sometimes unnecessary procedures. “We need to be more efficient and stop the over-prescribing of tests, surgical procedures,” Peterson said.

This is a no-brainer, and is due to the actual price of each test/procedure being hidden from the patient (at least those that have a decent plan). We’re obviously going to have to start charging those on the government teat for the majority of these extras. If you want it, pay for it out of your own pocket. No more passing on the bill to your kids and grandkids.

3. Reform Open-Ended Tax Subsidies for Health Insurance to build an Incentive for the Consumer to Reduce Costs

Currently, Peterson said, the tax-free system does not allow patients to make decisions on a procedure’s value and worth. “There should be a progressive tax, based on salary that sets limits on how much health care you can deduct without paying taxes on it,” Peterson said. He said there should be limits on how much of the employee’s benefit is tax free, adding employees should have to pay taxes on some of their contribution so there is a built-in incentive to reduce costs.

Another good point, though it is a little confusing. Essentially, the wealthy, union workers, and government workers currently receive very costly benefits packages, at least as compared to those in the private sector. The benefits are not taxed, even though they are essentially income. Overpaid government workers love to whine about how their salaries are lower than comparable salaries in the private sector – thus, the plush benefits they receive are fair and square. Even if the salary part were true (it no longer is true), these workers are forgetting that they do not pay taxes on their health insurance, while the private sector employees do pay income taxes on each dollar of their earnings.

4. Elderly Who Can, Should Pay for Their Own Health Insurance

Peterson said that able elderly people should pay for their own health insurance, arguing that this would allow us to take care of the poor while still having an incentive to reduce costs. He proposed an affluence test. “If you make above a certain income, you start paying taxes on your social security. People with incomes less than X amount can deduct this,” Peterson said.

Hell Yeah! When the majority of the nation’s wealth is already concentrated disproportionately among the elderly, it is beyond belief that the politicians have not yet grown the balls and taken on the AARP over this issue. Is is morally corrupt for wealthy retirees to collect social security and medical benefits, while there are millions of workers (the majority of them young) that are currently paying for those benefits, while these workers themselves have absolutely no medical insurance, often times facing financial ruin after a single medical incident.

Of course, I can already hear the whining:

“But I paid into the system for 40 years, and I’ll be damned if I don’t get back what I put in”.

Sorry guys, but as a collective group, you placed money into your Social Security Trust Fund with one hand, immediately pulled it back out with the other hand, and then went off on a huge spending binge. In fact, you spent a few trillion dollars more than you had saved, and conveniently left the debt for this extra consumption for your kids.

5. Create an Integrated Health Care System

Peterson suggested that a single coordinated system could drive down rising health care costs. “Instead of having eight different doctors, have one doctor who gets a set payment to care for your health — all the records are there, and they don’t do things that they don’t think is necessary,” he said.

In other words, get used to limited health care. There is only so much pie to go around, and that means not everyone will get to see specialists for each and every ache and pain.

Boomers admit mistakes at Commencement Speeches

The class of 2009 graduates this summer, and it has been interesting reading some intuitive comments mixed-in among the usually drivel-filled commencement speeches. The majority of recent grads, loaded down with debt from four years of education costs, are facing the most terrible labor market since the 30’s. Along with the lack of jobs and their own back-breaking debts, new grads should also be concerned about the trillions of dollars of past Boomer debt and future mounting entitlements they’ve been so generously gifted.

Some of the highlights:

Senator Mike Bennet, Colorado College

Senator Mike Bennet

Senator Mike Bennet

Part of our national creed is the belief that every generation of Americans should be able to go farther than their parents.

…My mother had even more opportunities than my grandparents dreamed, and she and my father were able to make a better life for me, my brother, and my sister.

But, today, this national creed is profoundly at risk, largely because my generation has not been faithful enough to our grandparents’ example.


Over this decade, Washington was printing IOU’s for the next generation as well, with our national debt doubling from $5 to $10 trillion, an increase largely attributable to tax breaks for the very wealthiest of us and to pay for a war we should never have fought to begin with.

And on Wall Street, in this decade and before, institutions recklessly and wantonly piled on mountains of unregulated debt that collapsed alongside our housing prices.

We lived beyond our means, and we are paying a heavy price for that today. But even more alarming than any price we are paying is the risk we are running, that we have limited the potential of future generations by burdening them with our poor choices, and our unwillingness to make tough ones.

Our policies and indecision have led us to a place where the gulf between rich and poor has gotten wider. Americans are now less likely than people living in a number of other industrialized countries to improve their economic status in their lifetime. As many as 100 million Americans now live in families earning less in real terms than their parents did at the same stage of life.

The crisis we face today stems from much more than foreclosed houses and credit swaps. It is a symptom of my generation’s lack of attention to the legacy of our grandparents, who built for the future. And now, we must ask ourselves who we will be as a country when we emerge from this crisis. Will we answer the call of this time, or will we fall back on the same tired arguments of the past?

Thomas Friedman, May 18, 2009, Grinnell College

Thomas Friedman

Thomas Friedman

My generation, the Baby Boomers, well, we’ve been the Grasshopper Generation, eating through just about everything like hungry locusts.


We got into this financial mess because we got disconnected from some of the most fundamental values that made us a wealthy country. We got disconnected from the basic connection between hard work, delayed gratification, achievement, and success in life.

But we also need the Re-Generation, not to help us only in restoring basic values, but also in creating real things of value. You see, we can’t borrow our way out of this economic crisis. We can’t stimulate our way out of this economic crisis with more deficit spending.

…We have to invent and innovate our way out of this crisis. We have to get away from just financial engineering, designing more and more exotic ways to make money from money, and get back to real engineering of stuff, stuff and services that people need to make their lives more productive, more healthy, more environmentally sound, and more enjoyable.

…Yes, we need good engineers to design those things…

Good ideas on that innovation bit. However, hasn’t Friedman been a lead proponent in offshoring our manufacturing to China and our technology to India, while assuming the millions of laid off workers from these industries would just re-train and find even better jobs. How’s that working out for us? Friedman recently ripped on Obama for requiring Tarp recipients to stop importing cheap third world laborers on H1B/L1 and other visas that US corporations use to bring down wages. How motivated do you think bright US students will be to enter into expensive and rigorous engineering schools when currently H1-B workers in US outnumber unemployed techies?

Governor Mitch Daniels of Indiana at Butler University on May 9, 2009

Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels

Governor Mitch Daniels

As a generation, you are off to an excellent start. You have taken the first savvy step on the road to distinction, which is to follow a weak act. I wish I could claim otherwise, but we Baby Boomers are likely to be remembered by history for our numbers, and little else, at least little else that is admirable.

We Boomers were the children that the Second World War was fought for. Parents who had endured both war and the Great Depression devoted themselves sacrificially to ensuring us a better life than they had. We were pampered in ways no children in human history would recognize. With minor exceptions, we have lived in blissfully fortunate times. The numbers of us who perished in plagues, in famine, or in combat were tiny in comparison to previous generations of Americans, to say nothing of humanity elsewhere.

All our lives, it’s been all about us. We were the “Me Generation.” We wore t-shirts that said “If it feels good, do it.” The year of my high school commencement, a hit song featured the immortal lyric “Sha-la-la-la-la-la, live for today.” As a group, we have been self-centered, self-absorbed, self-indulgent, and all too often just plain selfish. Our current Baby Boomer President has written two eloquent, erudite books, both about..himself.

As a generation, we did tend to live for today. We have spent more and saved less than any previous Americans. Year after year, regardless which party we picked to lead the country, we ran up deficits that have multiplied the debt you and your children will be paying off your entire working lives. Far more burdensome to you mathematically, we voted ourselves increasing levels of Social Security pensions and Medicare health care benefits, but never summoned the political maturity to put those programs on anything resembling a sound actuarial footing.

In sum, our parents scrimped and saved to provide us a better living standard than theirs; we borrowed and splurged and will leave you a staggering pile of bills to pay. It’s been a blast; good luck cleaning up after us.

John McFadden at University of Wisconsin–Fox Valley on May 21, 2009

…But first let’s talk about baby-boomers. It was very good to be a baby boomer in 1968; sorry you missed it.

We had Jimi and Janis, the Doors and the Beatles, and all we left for you was American Idol. After a decade or so as hippies who claimed to reject materialism we discovered arugula and cute shoes and became Yuppies. We also briefly discovered disco, but we don’t like to talk about that.

Moving further still from our youthful idealism, we discovered excessive consumption for its own sake – McMansions and Mercedes for everyone! – and since we did not have enough money to support all that spending we borrowed and leveraged in order to keep buying more stuff that we had convinced ourselves we needed and were entitled to. So deeply were we in the grip of consumerism that when our president urged us to respond to 9/11 by going shopping it made perfect sense to us. Run up your credit card debt or the terrorists win!

We didn’t bother to save because the value of our houses and our pension funds just kept magically increasing. It was good; it was very good! Money for nothing! We spent like drunken sailors and thoughtfully passed the bills on to you.

Now we are getting older and starting to worry about our health care needs. Poor, aging baby boomers! We have never settled for less than the best, so naturally we feel entitled to the highest quality health care for the rest of our lives. There are 78 million of us, and we plan to stick around for as long as possible while you pay for our social security and Medicare.

On behalf of the entire baby boom generation, I want to express my gratitude to each one of you. You get to clean up the mess left by the old economy.

Robert M. Herbert at Pomona College

Bob Herbert

Bob Herbert

When I look around at the state of affairs that my generation is handing off to you guys, I have to cringe:

Two wars, global warming, an economy in shambles, the newspaper industry (our main source of information) going up in smoke, the automobile industry up in smoke, the automobile industry (which powered the economy for so many decades) evaporating before our eyes.

The economic recession that we’re in is one of the longest and deepest since the Great Depression. Even people with advanced degrees are not immune to the drop-ff in employment.

Poverty and homelessness are increasing. And we are stockpiling budget deficits that may last for generations.
That is not the kind of environment that my generation inherited. In the mid-1960s, when the first wave of the baby boomers were about your age, the United States seemed like a nation touched by magic.

Unemployment was low. Wages and profits were high. And the nation’s wealth was distributed in a way that was remarkably equitable by today’s standards. The middle class was growing, and it was not yet a mortal sin for a politician to mention the poor. A first-rate college education was eminently affordable.

For all of its problems, and there were still many–it was the height of the Cold War, after all. Racism, sexism and homophobia were rampant. And Vietnam was a disaster. But for all of its problems, the U.S. seemed to be moving briskly in the right direction.
Not even the murderous violence that greeted the Civil Rights Movement could stem the optimism. James Farmer, one of the great leaders of the Civil Rights era, once told me: “They could kill us. But they couldn’t stop us.”

So my generation inherited a rich and flourishing landscape. It still required a lot of work, but it was filled with immense promise.
We were not good stewards of that landscape.
Somehow we allowed the United States to morph into a country that hollowed out its manufacturing base and sent the jobs overseas, That refused to maintain and rebuild its own infrastructure.

That would not establish a first-rate public school system for all of its children. That spent more money per capita than any other country on the planet for health care, but still could not cover some 50 million of its citizens.

It became a country that fought wars but had no idea how to win them or pay for them. A country that let a great city like New Orleans drown rather than protect it with an adequate system of levees.

It’s a country in which a bridge on an interstate highway in Minneapolis collapsed at rush hour, hurling cars, vans and trucks into the Mississippi River 80 feet below.

This is the landscape you guys are inheriting.

Retiree Fears Public Knowledge of Huge Pension May be Safety Risk

Filed under: Entitlements, Pensions
Tags: , , ,
admin @ 11:10 pm
Government pensions are generational theft

Government pensions are generational theft

For a while now, I’ve been under the impression that most Boomers employed by governments and receiving huge and unsustainable pensions were either in denial, bad at math, or both. Well, finally, I’ve got proof that at least some of these people are aware just how absurd their payments are.

Daniel Borenstein of the Contra Costa Times, whose already written quite a bit on the out-of-control pension system in the Northern California area, now brings us news of a former government worker going to court to essentially hide the amount of her pension from the public eye.

DONNA IRWIN doesn’t want us to know how much her public employee pension is.

The former captain who worked in the Contra Costa Sheriff’s Office for 37 years before retiring in 1992 with a base salary of about $68,000 a year now receives a pension of more than $100,000 annually. The question is, how much more? She doesn’t want the retirement association to tell us and she’s gone to court to try to block disclosure.

Full article here

The money quote is Irwin’s reason for attempting to suppress from the public (you know, the one’s ponying up for her luxurious retirement) knowledge of the full amount of the pension:

Disclosure of the information, Irwin argues, would cause her “irreparable injury in that my name released in conjunction with my monthly pension benefits would place my safety at risk and my privacy rights will be jeopardized.”

I’ll just assume the privacy bit was thrown into the statment for added effect. The gem is that she obviously understands that the slaves current workforce is getting the pitchforks ready for those that have sold them down the river.

We can expect more games like these in the future as retiring Boomers, especially those in the public sector, face the mathematics of unsupportable benefit packages promised by unscrupulous politicians of the past. After all, just last month, in the great and insolvent state of California, angry taxpayers rejected futher tax increases. Unfortunately, Californians had to lose upwards of 50% of their homes’ values and a double digit unemployement rate before realizing that paying firefighters upwards of $200,000/year plus benefits is not sustainable in the long run, at least while the average household salary in the private sector is about $60K.

NY Unions Agree on Limits for New Pensions

Filed under: Pensions
Tags:
admin @ 3:01 pm

Another unfunded government union, another agreement that leaves the retirees whole, while screwing the younger workers.

From the NyTimes today:

This agreement is a huge win for New York’s taxpayers and will lead to the most significant reform of our public pension system in decades,” the governor said in a statement Friday afternoon. “This is real reform to the pension system, which will substantially reduce costs to the taxpayers of New York State.

For future employees, the retirement age will rise to 62 from 55, and they will have to contribute 3 percent of their own salaries to their pensions for their entire careers, instead of the current requirement that they contribute for their first decade of service.

New workers will not vest in the pension plan until they reach 10 years of service, instead of the current five. The deal will also limit the amount of overtime that employees can use in their last years of work to increase their pension benefits.

The money quote, laying out the main theme of the plan:

But Edmund J. McMahon, director of the Empire Center for New York State Policy, a conservative-leaning research group, said the governor had not gone nearly far enough. The deal, he said, “allows you to pay more money to union members who are already ready to retire.

Housing Bubble’s Pop Could Doom Boomers

Filed under: Baby Boomers
Tags: , ,
admin @ 11:20 pm

We already know that most of the Boomers have another thing coming if they expect us to actually slave away for the rest of our lives in order to pay for their mistakes.

But now it gets worse for these over-spenders. Most of the boomers haven’t saved nearly enough to self-fund their lavish lifestyles in the retirement years. In fact, most boomers drank the kool-aid of the last few years and expected home prices to continue inflating forever; thus, retiring boomers would just sell their house in order to pay for an early retirement on the golf course.

Unfortunately, the price of homes is crashing with no end in site. Each percentage down equates to a less luxurious retirement for these soon-to-be-retirees.

An article from The Street.com goes into more detail…

Bond Prices and Out of Control Spending

Filed under: Economics
Tags: , ,
admin @ 10:57 pm

For those of you not to familiar with the financial world of bonds, here is an interesting blog from our favorite financial blogger, Karl Denninger.

Why should this concern you? Bond prices set the rates on your house mortage (along with its value), car payments, student loans, earned interest in your bank account, and your future tax liabilities – this is because a huge percentage of your taxes go to pay off government over-spending (a.k.a. the National Debt).

Essentially, the more fiscally irresponsible Congress is now, the more you can expect to pay in taxes!

Want health care, young person? Join the Army.

Filed under: Entitlements, Labor Market, Young Workers
Tags: ,
admin @ 10:37 pm

An interesting article sourcing a NYT article on how improving healthcare will probably diminish the US military. In a nutshell: if you’re young and want decent health insurance (forgetting for a moment that you’re already funding millions of retirees’ health benefits), you may have to join the armed services. God Bless America!

A Day of Infamy as the First Boomer Retires

Filed under: Baby Boomers, Entitlements
Tags:
admin @ 10:32 pm

October 15, 2007 will go down in history as a special day for young workers in the US and future generations of taxpayers. It was the day the first baby boomer retired.

There was plenty of small articles on most MSM outlets, though few had the courage to point out what this really means for current and future taxpayers. A standard Google search using keywords first baby boomer retires will list out the various articles.

Unconscionablie Debt

Alison Fraser, a federal spending analyst at the Heritage Foundation, discusses the status of Social Security and Medicare in advance of the trustees for the two programs releasing annual reports on Monday. The bottom line, Fraser said, is that the programs are creating an unconscionable debt for future generations of America.

Storms on the Horizon – Unfunded Liabilities Unfunded Liabilites: $99,200,000,000,000

Richard W. Fisher, current president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, speaks on the current liabilities facing future generations with regards to entitlement benefits. He does not waste time in laying out the point:

I want to speak to you tonight about an economic problem that we must soon confront or else risk losing our primacy as the world

© 2009 AANRP

Powered by WordPress